Insights for Leaders Navigating
Visibility, Credibility, and Growth.

From media strategy to reputation management, we explore the trends shaping public perception and share the approaches that drive measurable results for growing brands.

Is It Credible? Exploring What Factors Americans Trust in News Stories

It’s a simple question that, when asked, can bring a flood of responses: What makes a news story trustworthy?

A host of factors, which can vary among differing groups.

The Pew Research Center recently conducted a survey to examine those factors that Americans see as important when deciding whether they trust a news story. The findings may not come as a shock, as many Americans have their own biases regarding where they go for news. But the results provide insight into what different folks value when determining a story’s credibility.

The survey found that the bulk of U.S. adults believe that, when deciding if a news story is trustworthy, it is “at least somewhat important” to consider each of the five surveyed factors, with the news outlet that publishes the story leading the way:

  • The news organization that publishes the story (88%)
  • The sources cited in it (86%)
  • Their gut instinct about the story (77%)
  • The person who shared the story with them (68%)
  • The specific journalist who reported it (66%)
  • It has a lot of shares/comments/likes on social media (24%)

However, when taking it a step further in importance, the survey found that fewer U.S. adults view these factors as “very important” in news trustworthiness:  

  • The news organization that publishes the story (50%)
  • The sources cited in it (47%)
  • Their gut instinct about the story (30%)
  • The person who shared the story with them (24%)
  • The specific journalist who reported it (23%)
  • It has a lot of shares/comments/likes on social media (6%)

Political affiliation also influences how Americans determine news story credibility, with slight differences across party lines:

“Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents were slightly more likely than Republicans and GOP leaners to say it’s very important to consider the news organization that publishes a story (55% vs. 47%) and the sources that are cited in it (51% vs. 44%). Republicans, in turn, are more likely than Democrats to see their own gut instinct as very important (35% vs. 26%), though this is a minority view in both parties.”

Pew Research conducted the survey among 12,045 U.S. adults from March 8-14, 2021. It served as one of the latest reports on how media is viewed among Americans, which in recent years, has included more distrust and skepticism.

Last year, Gallup’s annual Governance poll found that many Americans remain distrustful of mass media, with six in 10 respondents saying they have “not very much” trust (27%) or “none at all” (33%) in mass media. Gallup has conducted its poll on trust in mass media since 1972. Overall, public trust remained at or exceeded the majority level until 2004, when it fell to 44%. After hitting 50% the next year, it has not risen above 47%. The sharpest decline since the poll’s inception came in 2016, when the trust level fell to 32%.

These poll and survey findings raise good questions about how we view news, what we value and trust in news reporting, and where our biases may lie. Sometimes, to really get to the heart of the matter, it may be best to turn the question on ourselves: What do you think makes a news story trustworthy?

Intentional Query Design: Second of a Three-Part Series

A well-written question will mean the same thing to all respondents.

Jennifer Leigh Brown

When creating a survey, if you’re hoping to receive accurate and insightful answers, the phrasing and functionality of your survey queries can determine the success of your results. Questions that are poorly worded, biased, confusing or don’t allow respondents to accurately reflect on their experiences can result in erroneous data. Answering these queries is a waste of time for respondents and, worse, their responses can be misconstrued in a surveyor’s findings.

In my last blog, Thoughtful Survey Design, I detailed how to identify your survey purpose, determine your target population and determine questions that will help determine demographics. For this post, we’re diving into the meat of surveys and the importance of crafting thoughtful, well-phrased and unbiased questions. First, I’ll define some crucial terms around survey development:

  • Respondent – an individual of the target population.
  • Bias – a factor that affects the representative capacity of a question, including how clearly and easily respondents can respond to a question.
  • Satisficing – a tendency for respondents to put in the least amount of effort they can when answering a survey.
  • Skip logic – when some survey questions are conditional and only appear if relevant. Use this feature to filter your respondents and the questions they face based on their responses.
  • Qualitative data – Labels, names and descriptive information. Occurrences can be counted and you can determine proportions and percentages.
    • Nominal data are categories, names, or labels that don’t have an innate order. This can include data like country, brand name or mode of transportation.
    • Ordinal data is nominal information that contains a sense of ranking or order. This can include data like year in college or a scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
  • Quantitative data – Indicates how many or how much of something on a numerical scale. Further statistics can be calculated with this data.
    • Interval data is recorded with standard units of measurement with equal intervals. This can include temperature, SAT scores or your credit score.
    • Ratio data is interval data but with a meaningful zero point that represents the absence of that characteristic. This includes weight, time, distance and count.

 

Question Types

Before crafting your questions, it’s important to know what type of results you want. If you want proportion and frequency statistics, text responses, and relative comparisons, you’ll likely have to ask different questions than if you want statistics like averages, standard deviations and probability distributions. To help clarify, below are some key question modalities and the output they’ll give you.

  1. Multiple Choice. Multiple choice questions are a flexible and relatively easy-to-use question style for both surveyors and respondents. This format can allow for just one response (forced-choice) or for the respondent to select all the options that apply to them, but Pew Research suggests that forced-choice questions yield more accurate data. The data these questions yield is easy to parse; typically results are a count of the number of responses to each option, or, in the case of the multiple-answer option, a matrix of each respondent and their choices. Depending on the options the question offers, this question type can result in qualitative or quantitative data.
    1. Binary/Dichotomous. These questions offer just two choices, such as yes/no. These questions don’t provide a neutral option or allow the respondent to express nuance, but can be useful for skip logic that allows respondents to go into detail with further questions based on their choice. These questions can provide ratio data if the binary choices are translated to 1s and 0s.
    2. Rating. Questions that ask you to rate something, like from one to five stars, are typically easy to understand and translate across language barriers. These scales seem to make opinions and experiences quantifiable, but the data you receive is actually ordinal because the intervals aren’t standard.
    3. Likert Scales. These are a type of rating question, typically ranging from a 1 for “strongly agree” to a 5 for “strongly disagree.” Similarly, semantic differential questions ask you to complete a sentence with one of the options provided. Like Rating questions, Likert and semantic differential questions result in ordinal data.
  2. Rank Order. Ranking questions require respondents to order the options provided based on a perceived quality. The respondent is required to make choices between two or more things which can offer further insight into the respondents’ opinions. These questions can be frustrating and time-consuming, so make sure to limit the number of items and use these questions thoughtfully. As the options themselves have no order, the data collected is nominal.
  3. Text Boxes. Text boxes can vary in size and character limit but accept free responses from participants. Typically, this data is nominal, but some survey tools allow you to specify that you only want to receive numerals. This can be useful for gathering phone numbers, zip codes, ages and more.
  4. Submission. Requesting that your respondent upload a file or submit a picture can be a useful way to receive more information from respondents but can be confusing or invasive. Be clear on the submission you expect, acceptable file types, how to upload, and file size requirements.

 

Writing Queries

With your main survey focus in mind, start coming up with key takeaways to glean from the survey. You’ll use these core topics to develop survey questions. For example, your main focus could be to determine the best ice cream flavors to offer in Seattle. Some core topics might include determining respondent’s favorite flavors, exploring the boundary between interesting and off-putting flavor combinations, or ascertaining appropriate price ranges.

Based on your core topics, pair what kind of data will be able to address the topics. If you want to know a price that people would pay for a unique ice cream flavor, you’ll need to use a question style that offers quantitative data, likely a slider. If you want to get ideas for ice cream toppings, a text box will allow the respondent to respond freely.

From there, start drafting the queries. Use creativity and the 5 Ws (and H) of journalism to navigate and delve into your core topics. Once you’ve developed your first draft of your survey queries, double-check that you follow these best practices:

  • Keep vocabulary simple and check your grammar. Avoid jargon, use fewer words when possible, stick to active voice and consider using an informal, conversational tone to make your survey more inviting. Make sure to avoid double negatives and unclear references.
  • Be specific. Clarify any specificities around time frame, location, scope or experience.
  • Ask one thing at a time. Asking multiple things within the same question can confuse respondents. If additional instructions, examples or context is needed, try to keep these in a separate sentence.
  • Avoid leading/loaded questions. These questions make assumptions about the respondent or their experience that are hard for them to deny. For example, asking, “Why is ice cream your favorite dessert?” assumes that ice cream is their favorite dessert. In addition, acquiescence bias is the tendency for people to agree to a statement, regardless of the content. Rephrasing the question can mitigate this bias in many cases.
  • Offer comprehensive options. Research your population to determine the best options to include. If there are many more options available, consider using “of the following” to allow your respondent to answer in good faith. If your options are not comprehensive, you can also use an “other” option with a text box to capture their response – this doesn’t seem to affect the reliability or validity of the data.
  • Use extreme judgments like “never” and “always” carefully. For most subjects, there are exceptions and gray areas; using a scale with options between always and never tends to capture data better.
  • Vary your question types. Respondents can get irritated or lazy when they are asked the same type of question repeatedly, which can lead to satisficing. Varying question types and difficulty can make your survey more interesting to complete.

 

Survey Assembly

Once you’ve drafted your queries and made sure they’re well-phrased, unbiased, comprehensive and will help you address your core topics, it’s time to arrange them into an order that will make sense and encourage the respondents to answer all queries. If you need help eliminating unnecessary questions, consider learning about how you can choose your best idea.

As I explained in my last blog, start your survey with screening questions to confirm all participants are part of the intended population and, if they are not, use skip logic to cut their survey short.

The question order is mainly subjective, but here are some guidelines that can improve your results. Research from Ohio State University’s Jon Krosnick suggests that interspersing easy questions between hard or time-consuming questions will make the survey seem more interesting and easier to complete.

Grouping questions into themes will help one question give context to another. Progress bars and similar indicators can boost the completion rate. Funneling, starting with broad, easy questions, progressing to specific and time-consuming questions, and then finishing with quicker and optional questions, gives the respondent time to “warm up” and makes the survey seem quicker with a slide to the finish line.

To this end, consider placing optional demographic questions at the end of the survey.

After writing the introduction to your survey and uploading your questions onto your survey platform of choice, test your survey on yourself and others. This is a chance to check your timing, verify the usability of your survey tool, add context and instructions as needed and judge if you need to account for further edge cases within your close-ended questions. Finally, this testing will give you some scrap data from the program to check that the output will be usable when you go to analyze your results.

The final step is to publish it! Share your survey with the goal of exceeding your minimum sample size within your target population. Check out my last blog for more information about sampling.

I will go into more depth about how to analyze your results in my July 2021 blog – come back to learn more!

You should now have a targeted survey for a well-defined population that will give you data to tackle your core topics. You’ve given respondents the best chance to communicate their experiences easily and accurately. All that’s left to do is to see what they say.

Delta-Q Launches New Partner Program

Last month, we collaborated with Delta-Q Technologies (Delta-Q) to launch its new partner program, “Charged by Delta-Q.” The program is a battery compatibility initiative to help original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) identify and deploy quality power systems in their equipment.

Delta-Q created this program to increase collaboration among battery manufacturers and OEMs. The program provides OEMs with a library of power systems that have been tested and validated with Delta-Q’s chargers, software and charge algorithms.

Leading up to the announcement, we worked closely with Delta-Q and its partners to discuss program messaging and media strategy, and to finalize materials. When sharing the program with media, some reporters were surprised to learn that Delta-Q successfully launched a partner program that relied on competitors to collaborate. Despite being competitors, the battery partners were eager to join because they have a shared vision around the quality of charging and the future of the electric vehicle (EV) industry.

Delta-Q selected the initial nine battery manufacturers to join the program because all the companies have shared values around trust and equipment performance. Delta-Q will continue to strategically grow its program, carefully vetting battery companies with the same lens on values and collaboration.

Below is a list of the articles secured from our media outreach around the announcement. To learn more about Delta-Q’s battery compatibility and its partners, visit the program website. 

 

  1. OEM Industry Update: New Charged by Delta-Q Program Aids Electric Vehicle Development – 6/8/21
  2. The Cleanzine: New Battery Compatibility Program facilitates innovation and collaboration among electric battery, charging, and equipment sectors – 6/3/21
  3. EeNews Newsletter: Weekly News and Technology Update – May 28, 2021 – 5/27/21
  4. Forklift Action Newsletter: News Edition #1027 – 5/27/21
  5. Forklift Action: Delta-Q flags compatibility – 5/27/21
  6. EeNews: Delta-Q launches battery compatibility partner program – 5/26/21
  7. International Rental News: Delta-Q launches battery compatibility program – 5/25/21
  8. Supply Chain 24/7: Delta-Q Technologies launches battery compatibility program – 5/25/21
  9. Material Handling 24/7: Delta-Q Technologies launches battery compatibility program – 5/25/21
  10. Modern Materials Handling: Delta-Q Technologies launches battery compatibility program – 5/25/21
  11. CleanLink: Delta-Q Launches Battery Compatibility Program – 5/25/21
  12. Access, Lift & Handlers: Delta-Q launches battery compatibility program – 5/25/21
  13. Alt Energy Magazine: RELiON Battery Joins Delta-Q Technologies’ Battery Compatibility Program – 5/25/21
  14. BodyWorx: Delta-Q Technologies Launches Battery Compatibility Program – 5/25/21
  15. Material Handling Wholesaler: Flux Power joins Delta-Q Technologies’ Battery Compatibility Program – 5/24/21
  16. New Power Progress: Delta-Q launches battery compatibility program – 5/24/21
  17. OEM Off-Highway: Delta-Q Technologies Launches Battery Compatibility Program – 5/24/21
  18. Canadian Manufacturing: Delta-Q Technologies launches battery compatibility program – 5/24/21
  19. Lift and Access: Delta-Q Launches New Partner Program – 5/24/21
  20. Electronic Products & Technology: Delta-Q Technologies launches battery compatibility program – 5/24/21
  21. RV News: Vancouver Battery Supplier Launches New Partner Program – 5/24/21
  22. North American Clean Energy: Delta-Q Technologies Launches Battery Compatibility Program – 5/24/21
  23. Modern Materials Handling: Flux Power joins Delta-Q Technologies’ battery compatibility program – 5/24/21
  24. Material Handling Network: Flux Power Joins Delta-Q Technologies’ Battery Compatibility Program – 5/24/21
  25. Supply Chain Management Review: Flux Power joins Delta-Q Technologies’ battery compatibility program – 5/24/21
  26. Lift & Hoist International: Flux Power joins Delta-Q battery compatibility program – 5/24/21
  27. Material Handling 24/7: Flux Power joins Delta-Q Technologies’ battery compatibility program – 5/24/21

 

We’re thrilled about the initial response to the program and eager to help Delta-Q and its partners share program milestones.

To learn more about our work with Delta-Q, check out the following blog posts:

The Evolution of PR Measurement

One interesting trend that surfaced in Ragan’s 2021 Communications Benchmark Report is that communicators are measuring their work more frequently. And, they are using the data more strategically with a streamlined focus on benchmarking, identifying the best channels and making better editorial decisions.

According to the study, last year 30 percent of respondents described their measurement efforts as ad hoc. This year that number decreased to 17 percent, with a large increase in monthly measurement efforts, from 24 percent of respondents last year to 37 percent this year.

The report highlighted several factors that influenced this shift. Typically speaking, communicators are more likely to be involved in strategic decisions. Communicators have access to the CEO. The most fascinating trend in the report indicates the pandemic actually provided a silver lining for communicators – which seems unthinkable – in that their value to their organizations rose exponentially. The report highlights that the work of communicators moved to center stage with a shift to the remote work environment, and initiatives such as Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

As our work as communicators comes into sharper focus and play, so does the importance of measuring success. Overall, 78 percent of respondents in the study measure their communications effectiveness. Additionally, the report found that communicators are more satisfied with their measurement efforts. With 41 percent of respondents reporting they are either satisfied or very satisfied with their ability to measure communications effectiveness. This is a significant uptick from the 28 percent of respondents who said the same thing in 2020, which clearly indicates communicators are more focused on evaluating their work.

The Benchmark Report also found that communicators are getting innovative about applying the measurement in more strategic ways. In years past, the focus was on identifying the most effective channels to disseminate your message. That focus has been bypassed this year. The data in the report shows that in 2021 there is significantly more focus on making better editorial content decisions and on benchmarking best practices. The report credits the notion that there is less of a perceived need to gain a seat at the table for strategic decisions, as the access to the C-suite increased throughout 2020 organically while communicators also forged new company-wide alliances.

Beyond measurement, the report provides a deep dive into the data and analysis of the major trends in the profession over the last 12 months, including:

  • How the crises of 2020 impacted the discipline
  • Communicators’ outlook and priorities for the next three years
  • Communications budgets
  • Technology trends and product rankings
  • Trends in communications planning and measurement
  • Crisis-communications policies
  • Trends in both internal and external communications channels
  • Team structures

If you’re interested in learning more, you can download a copy of Ragan’s third annual Communications Benchmark Report here.

Three Soft Skills Critical to Success in PR

“Seeking a highly-intelligent, high-judgment, self-motivated, and creative communications professional”

“Looking for a creative and strategic PR manager to join our office”

“This role requires a passionate, self-motivated and organized professional “

Even though the tools and skills PR professionals use every day are multiplying rapidly, it only takes a quick scan of PR job listings to see that hiring managers are prioritizing candidates who have soft skills and a willingness to learn, over hard skills.

In my experience, there are three soft skills that are critical to navigating the PR landscape: interpersonal skills, critical thinking and adaptability. The Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) highlights the first two in its definition of public relations as “a strategic communication process that builds mutually beneficial relationships between organizations and their publics.”

 

Interpersonal skills

If it weren’t clear enough from this definition that relationship building is at the core of public relations, PRSA adds that PR is “about influencing, engaging and building a relationship with key stakeholders.” Interpersonal skills like communication, teamwork and collaboration are rooted in a person’s ability to build strong relationships based on trust, respect and integrity. Strong relationships with key stakeholders, such as the media, clients and teammates, are key to success.

Due to industry contraction and downsizing, journalism is an increasingly challenging profession. PR professionals are in a position to ease some of the burden on reporters. By understanding a publication’s focus and what their audience values, you can pitch only stories that are a true fit, thereby easing the journalist’s workload and making them more likely to trust the news you pitch them in the future.

Strong client relationships are based on trust earned by setting realistic expectations, reliably delivering what you promise, and providing honest advice and counsel, even when it is difficult to do so. Considering the marketplace from your clients’ perspective and offering creative ways to strengthen their message and build their brand will contribute to building your own reputation, leading to referrals and growing your business.

A network of colleagues you can rely on for collaboration, advice and support is invaluable. Brainstorming with others inevitably multiplies your supply of creative ideas, and a second set of eyes on a press release or pitch can potentially catch a damaging mistake. In PR, this job can’t be done successfully alone, and having others who can take up the slack when needed is crucial.

 

Critical and Creative Thinking

The key to leveraging the resources of your network is the second soft skill. From prioritizing client requests and establishing meaningful metrics to anticipating obstacles and managing risk, critical thinking is a broad category that encompasses many of the skills PR professionals rely on to navigate their daily work.

Much of a PR professional’s time is spent evaluating opportunities and situations based on experience and consideration of all the risks and benefits. Consider the questions you might ask when assessing a media opportunity: is the benefit worth the time required to secure the opportunity? Is the outlet in line with the client’s brand and values? Are there other opportunities that would deliver a higher ROI?

Problem solving is another mainstay of the job. When things go wrong, evaluating what can be salvaged and determining the best next step requires strategic and tactical thinking as well as creativity. This is particularly true in crisis situations, a common public relations challenge.

 

Flexibility and Adaptability

One predictable aspect of public relations is change. From changes in technology to staffing changes at publications and shifting tactics, the more willing you are to embrace change and adapt quickly, the more successful you will be.

Even the day-to-day activity of PR requires adaptability. A typical day could involve developing a byline article, writing a press release, facilitating a media briefing, conducting a client meeting and following up with journalists on a recent pitch. In an agency setting, those undertakings could each be for different clients from distinct industries. Easily shifting from one task to another ensures an efficient use of valuable resources.

Flexibility is also useful when communicating with your clients and adjusting to their different styles. Whether by adopting the jargon of their industry or using the communications tools they prefer, adapting to differing client styles and expectations builds rapport and fosters trust.

 

In conclusion, to be happy and thrive in PR, variety should be something you appreciate and enjoy. You can play many roles and should be comfortable wearing many different hats in a single day or even within an hour.

Debunking Three Common PR Myths

For individuals not familiar with public relations, the industry and its day-to-day activities may seem like a mystery. TV shows and movies tend to depict one of two extremes: (1) luxurious parties and red carpets or (2) high-stress crisis communications.

These are just two examples of how the industry and its professionals are misunderstood. Outlined below is the truth behind three common PR myths.

 

Myth 1: No Boys Allowed

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, women make up 66.4% of the PR industry. That’s a far cry from the architecture and engineering sectors, where they make up 16.5% of the workforce.

While there has been no real research into why there are more women than men in PR, the conventional notion holds that PR is appealing to women as a career choice because it requires a substantial investment in building relationships and expanding lines of communications, two areas that women are said to excel at compared to their male peers.

But, contrary to popular belief, PR is not an all-girls club. It’s actually well documented that men hold the vast majority of CEO positions in the top PR agencies, with some estimates topping nearly 80%. Though this does demonstrate a notable gap between men and women, it also showcases the role men play in the industry at large.

 

Myth 2: PR Equals Parties and Fun

If you’re like me, your first impression of a public relations professional came from watching Samantha Jones from Sex and the City. PR seemed like it was all about attending star-studded events, dining at the hottest and newest restaurants, and going to the most glamorous parties. Though partying in New York City certainly sounds fun, there’s a whole lot more to the industry than how Samantha Jones portrayed it. 

PR pros regularly monitor news cycles, they know what reporters cover and when they move to a new publication, they provide media training, and counsel clients on messaging. They organize press tours, set up trade events, conduct media outreach and coordinate client interviews. And they write – a lot. From PR plans to contributed content, pitches, speaking and award submissions, PR pros are expert writers and storytellers.

Before I completely ruin the rosiness of on-screen public relations, there are several fun aspects of the job. The most fun for me is the people I get to connect with – from subject matter experts and CEOs to reporters and videographers. And of course, nothing feels quite as good as securing results and hearing how happy a client is with my team’s hard work.

 

Myth 3: It’s All About Spin

Cambridge Dictionary defines spin as, “a particular way of representing an event or situation to the public so that it will be understood in a way that you want it to be understood.” Or rather, a way to save face and alter a story to avoid a negative reaction.

According to PR Week, “spin” is too simple a term for the work PR practitioners do. Sure, they seek to influence, but also counsel, market, promote, and advocate for their brands and clients. Simply put, PR is much more than spin.

It’s understandable why people are cynical when it comes to the purpose of public relations. The average person only sees a PR professional when they are advising a politician or apologizing for a corporate scandal. However, PR is much more than that.

PR is brand development – building an image that showcases personality, values, industry expertise and talent. It is remaining accountable, transparent and honest when something doesn’t go to plan. It is engaging audiences and producing excellent content.

There’s so much more to PR than meets the eye – especially as it’s depicted in pop culture. At its core, public relations is “a strategic communication process that builds mutually beneficial relationships between organizations and their publics.”